| Whiting
School of
Engineering
1996 Annual
Report
Electrical and Computer Engineering Geography and Environmental Engineering Materials Science and Engineering Center for Language and Speech Processing Center for Nondestructive Evaluation Chemical Propulsion Information Agency Instructional Television Facility Part-Time Programs in Engineering and Applied Science Teaching and Research Initiatives | Report From the DeanFaculty | Teaching | Research | Service It is appropriate for my message in the 1996 Annual Report for the Whiting School of Engineering to begin with an endorsement of the new Johns Hopkins University president, William Brody. Our 13th president is well known to the Whiting School and the School of Medicine, and we are delighted that he has joined the faculty of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. His knowledge of engineering and the roles it plays in higher education and in our daily lives is critical to our continued success and growth. I am confident that he will give the University the guidance it needs in the coming years to address actively and effectively the needs of students, faculty, and the marketplace. As opportunities arise, I urge alumni and friends to meet President Brody and extend a personal "welcome back" to the Johns Hopkins community. Of equal importance to the Whiting School is the leadership that electrical engineering alumnus Michael Bloomberg '64 demonstrated in the $900 million "Johns Hopkins Initiative" campaign as its chair. His magnificent gift of $55 million to the University in 1995, which includes $15 million for the engineering effort, "Designing for Technological Leadership," positioned the overall campaign to achieve 66 percent of its goal after only two years. In May of this year, the University's board of trustees elected Bloomberg as chair. Bloomberg's experience in leading the campaign and as head of the highly successful Bloomberg L.P. make him an excellent choice to lead the board's efforts. The Whiting School's campaign theme, "Designing for Technological Leadership," made its first appearance as the title of a report issued in 1993. That document presented a perspective on the mission and vision of the Whiting School and provided an assessment of engineering at Hopkins, a strategy for the future, and priorities for the upcoming campaign. In particular, the strategy component described where the Whiting School needed to direct its efforts in the four areas of faculty development, teaching, research, and service. After three years, it is time to revisit and update that report, at the same time reflecting on the goals and how far engineering has progressed since then. As part of this message, I'd like to review the Whiting School's major achievements in these areas. Faculty Teaching In another, very important, element of engineering education, we realize that many students begin their first year of graduate school in the dual roles of student and teaching assistant. These individuals are our future professors, yet they may lack the confidence and skills necessary to communicate concepts to undergraduates unfamiliar with the discipline. While those qualities come with time, practice, and mentoring, there are ways to make effective teaching a reality and not simply a goal. In fall 1995, Charles R. Westgate, associate dean for academic affairs, and Matthew Crenson, professor of political science, introduced a revamped training course for new teaching assistants. The two seasoned instructors gave formal presentations that covered several critical areas, including teaching techniques, problem resolution, and the rewards of teaching. Participants also learned about the entering undergraduate class, and their abilities and expectations. This training course will be offered to new students at the beginning of each academic year. Research Service In personal service to others, I'd like to mention that the Whiting School faculty and staff were instrumental in the successful 1995 United Way campaign at Johns Hopkins. It was engineering's turn to lead the campaign efforts for the University, and the many volunteers in all divisions helped the University exceed its overall goal by six percent, while the Whiting School increased its support by 18 percent. What does the future hold for the Whiting School? Many who are interested in engineering education see a need to change dramatically the way engineering students learn. Some advocate moving to a five- or six-year course of study, with the master's degree becoming the basic degree of the profession. Others see increasing the practical experience engineering students receive while in school. Still others recommend requiring more courses in the liberal arts, business, and law. There is no question that the role of the engineer in the global marketplace is evolving, and any engineering curriculum must reflect that fact. In examining these new trends, the Whiting School remains committed to providing a premier engineering program for its students and faculty. No matter how the engineering curriculum might change, the Whiting School's vision remains steadfast: "Our students should be educated not only to solve problems of today but also to define the key problems, and solutions, of tomorrow." (Editor's note: The 1996 Annual Report covers the period from January 1995 through June 1996. Future reports will review the academic/fiscal year.) |